Categories
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Ambulatory Surgery Centers
- Anesthesiologists
- Antitrust in Healthcare
- Behavioral Health
- Clinical Integration
- Compliance Issues
- COVID-19 Resources
- Dental Practice Issues
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Contracting
- Health Care Legislation
- Health Law Practice
- HIPAA – Health Information Privacy
- Home Health
- Hospital Issues
- Licensing
- Long Term Care
- Managed Care Contracting
- Medical Staff Organization & Structure
- Medicare and Medicaid
- Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement
- Physician Issues
- Radiology Issues
- Reimbursement Issues
- Self Disclosure Protocols
- Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Issues
- Telemedicine
- Uncategorized
- Wisconsin Government
- Wisconsin Health Laws
- Wisconsin Hospitals
- Wisconsin Long Term Care
- Wisconsin Physician Issues
Wisconsin Health Law Posts
- Birth to 3 Program Family Communication Published
- Wisconsin HIPAA Resources –
- CMS Will Hold Lessons from the Front Line
- Wisconsin Emergency Order #35 –
- Wisconsin Announces Residential Renter Assistance, But Details are Scarce
Meta
RUG System for Skilled Nursing Facility Reimbursement – Time is Running Out
It is currently anticipated that the RUG system, which is currently used to calculate reimbursement for Medicare Part A skilled nursing services, will be changed over the next year. CMS is currently considering a new Resident Classification System that will completely change the way SNFs are reimbursed for their services.
Providers are getting glimpses of what may be included in the new calculation system. CMS issued a draft sample worksheet using the RCS-1 system. The stated purpose is to give providers a description of how the new system would work. The worksheet gives a description of how a manual calculation would take place using the RCS-I methodology.
The sample draft worksheet that was issued by CMS is available here. RCS_I_Logic-508_Final
linkscolor = “000000”; highlightscolor = “888888”; backgroundcolor = “FFFFFF”; channel = “none”;
Read more here: Health Law Blog
OCR Citation for Improper Disclosure of PHI in Response to a Subpoena
A health care provider or other covered entity under HIPAA is permitted to disclose protected health information if it receives a lawful order from a court or administrative tribunal. this does not mean that a provider can simply release everything it has in a patient record when it receives a court order. Some records, such as mental health or substance abuse records might have special protections or limitations that apply. Additionally a provider should closely review the relevant order and only disclose the information that is specifically required by the order.
The ability to release information in response to a subpoena, as opposed to an order of a court, is subject to different rules. Patient information can only be provided under subpoena if certain notification requirements of the Privacy Rule are met. The notification requirements require the provider who received the subpoena to obtain evidence that there were reasonable efforts to notify the person who is the subject of the information about the request. This is intended to give the individual an opportunity to object to the disclosure, or obtain a protective order from the court.
The application of these rules are
Read more here: Health Law Blog
Identification of AIDS Status Through Medical Alert System
Dentist Revises Process to Safeguard Medical Alert PHI
A recent OCR investigation of a dental practice’s flagging of patients records highlights a potential HIPAA violation. The OCR investigation confirmed allegations that the dental practice flagged some of its medical records with a red sticker with the word “AIDS” on the outside cover. Records were handled so that other patients and staff without need to know could read the sticker. A patient complaint commenced an OCR investigation into whether the practice potentially identified the AIDS status of patients within the office.
When notified of the complaint filed with OCR, the dental practice immediately removed the red AIDS sticker from the complainant’s file. To resolve this matter, OCR also required the practice to revise its policies and operating procedures and to move medical alert stickers to the inside cover of the records. Further, the covered entity’s Privacy Officer and other representatives met with the patient and apologized, and followed the meeting with a written apology.
The lesson here is not to place special medical alerts on the outside of physical patient records. This is a particularly bad practice in a dental office where the typical office setup can
Read more here: Health Law Blog




