Categories
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Ambulatory Surgery Centers
- Anesthesiologists
- Antitrust in Healthcare
- Behavioral Health
- Clinical Integration
- Compliance Issues
- COVID-19 Resources
- Dental Practice Issues
- Fraud and Abuse
- Health Care Contracting
- Health Care Legislation
- Health Law Practice
- HIPAA – Health Information Privacy
- Home Health
- Hospital Issues
- Licensing
- Long Term Care
- Managed Care Contracting
- Medical Staff Organization & Structure
- Medicare and Medicaid
- Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement
- Physician Issues
- Radiology Issues
- Reimbursement Issues
- Self Disclosure Protocols
- Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Issues
- Telemedicine
- Uncategorized
- Wisconsin Government
- Wisconsin Health Laws
- Wisconsin Hospitals
- Wisconsin Long Term Care
- Wisconsin Physician Issues
Wisconsin Health Law Posts
- The Impact of a Physician’s Ethical Obligations on Concierge Program Structure
- Birth to 3 Program Family Communication Published
- Wisconsin HIPAA Resources –
- CMS Will Hold Lessons from the Front Line
- Wisconsin Emergency Order #35 –
Meta
Anti-kickback Statutes – Free Transportation Services to Patients – Safe Harbor Regulations
22/03/17
Free Patient Transportation Services
Factors to Consider When the Transportation Safe Harbor is Not Satisfied
Here are some factors pulled from various OIG Advisory Opinions on free patient transportation. The safe harbors for patient transportation should also be consulted, but these factors may be relevant in cases where not all safe harbor elements can be met. Some factors identify criteria that makes an arrangement suspect.
- Offering out of state patients free transportation to receive services.
- Compensating drivers of vans or other vehicles on a per patient basis for patients that are brought to the facility.
- Offering free luxury transportation.
- Offering free transportation to the patients of physicians or other referral sources in order to induce them to refer to the facility.
- Free ambulance services without making any determination of financial need.
- Offering free transportation to nursing home residents to a facility,especially for services of questionable necessity.
- The costs of the free transportation must be borne by the facility and should not be passed on to any Federal health care program.
- Higher levels of advertising and marketing of the transportation service will raise more concern.
- Transportation from one provider to another raise a higher level of concern than transportation directly to the facility. In other words, where the transportation is from the place of business of a potential referral source (i.e. physician or other health care provider) the fraud and abuse risk is higher.
- Whether there are other methods of affordable transportation in the area. If affordable transportation options are not readily available, the arrangement will raise less concern.
- Whether the services are offered and/or marketed outside of the facilities normal service area. The OIG looks with disfavor on “leap-frog” arrangements that induce patients to bypass other closer providers due to the free or low cost transportation arrangement.
- The OIG also raised general concerns about the provider who uses free transportation to gain access to patients, potentially for unnecessary or questionable services.
Comments Off on Anti-kickback Statutes – Free Transportation Services to Patients – Safe Harbor Regulations